Have you ever wondered why someone who is obviously wrong will sometimes not admit it, even when you've clearly shown them their error? Why do older folks hold on to their ancient way of doing things, when new methods are clearly more effective?
We judge these people harshy, I think. We think them stupid to not choose the better way. But is it really so simple for them?
Let's look at this in a more scientific view (note that while much of this is fact, the conclusions are simply my theories). The mind is a large and complex system of electric paths that we call neural networks. When we learn something, the mind forms a path for electrons to flow, allowing the transfer of knowledge from memory to the forefront of our conciousness. Creating these paths takes a lot of energy, but changing them is even tougher. Unlearning is not an easy task. You have to give up all branches from that path as well... all other conclusions you've made as a result of that idea.
Over time, other neural paths are formed around these paths, virtually holding them in place. Thus appealing to pure logic and convincing becomes useless. These paths require far too much energy if they are to be modified. Only a high energy experience, such as a very emotional experience, will be strong enough to make the necessary changes.
So keep this in mind the next time you get in a logical debate. Whether you're right or not, you are unlikely to change the mind of anyone that is not already open-minded on the particular subject. Be considerate, for the stubbornness isn't really them just being stupid.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Mark,
Hey buddy, I'm glad I found your blog. Interesting thoughts by the way. Stubbornness can be a good thing, especially in a world that is becoming increasingly wicked and where views about morality change all the time.
Post a Comment